
Considering referee decisions
I need to respond to a Chinese sentence that's talking about a referee's wrong decision in an Italian Serie D game. It seems the user might be looking for news, clarification, or a deeper discussion. They didn't ask a specific question, so I could suggest options like a summary or analysis of the rules. I could explain why a goal from the side netting shouldn't count and discuss the implications of VAR not being available in Serie D. I’ll provide a brief analysis on how goals are validated too.Explaining goal decision rules
According to the Laws of the Game, once play restarts after a kick-off, a referee can't change a goal decision, except for mistaken identity or violence. I need to reference Law 10 and Law 5, which outline that decisions can only be changed before play has resumed. If there's a side-net entry, the net should be checked beforehand. I could mention the 2013 "phantom goal" incident as an example. It might be helpful to suggest next steps, like drafting a post or fact-checking this information.Clarifying goal validity rules
I need to explain that according to the IFAB Laws of the Game, particularly Law 10, a goal counts only if the ball fully crosses the goal line between the posts and under the crossbar. If it goes through the side net, it hasn’t actually crossed between the posts, making it a wrong decision. I could also mention how assistant referees signal by not running to the halfway line and the importance of pre-match net checks and awareness, especially in Serie D, where there’s no VAR.Addressing rare goal scenarios
I need to cover some rare cases where a ball might enter through the side netting. Sometimes this happens due to a tear in the net, or the ball can hit a support and bounce out. If it entered the side net from outside, it doesn't count as a goal. I should suggest that if the ball went out over the goal line without touching a defender, it would restart with a goal kick. If it went in through a hole, a dropped ball restart is necessary.
确实是误判。
- 规则要点:依IFAB竞赛规则,只有当球“完全越过门线,且在两门柱之间并低于横梁”才算进球。球从边网/侧面网洞进入,并未在门柱间越线,不应判进球。
- 正确判罚:如果是进攻方最后触球,球从侧面越出底线并挂边网,应判球门球;若是防守方最后触球,则应判角球。
- 裁判机制:边裁应以站位和旗语协助判定是否在门柱间越线;主裁可在未重开比赛前与助理沟通后更改判罚。一旦开球重开,原则上不得再改判。
- 赛场保障:赛前必须检查球网是否完好、与门柱地面固定牢靠,避免“穿网”或缝隙导致的错判。低级别联赛通常无VAR,更需依赖站位与协作。
- 相似案例:德甲2013“基斯林幽灵球”、英冠2008/09“沃特福德幽灵球”都是侧网/网洞导致的错判典型。
需要我:
- 用通俗图示解释这球为什么不算吗?
- 给你写一段社媒短评/解说词? 
- 帮你整理赛规原文对应条款的要点对照?
.gif)